From these sessions the similarities to the split: General Religion appears from fear, especially fear of natural disasters such as lightning, floods, earthquakes, volcanoes, and stormy. Is always the danger threatening human life from how centuries. Old people did not understand the operation of nature, does not understand the cause of this disaster; and fear of natural disasters so people started looking for answers, the cause. The search is opening for the answer about what is happening around the life of man.

Awareness of danger and safety to the primary cause of Religion and Science was born. Parallel to the fear of natural disasters, man is amazing, of admiration before the period of nature. This is not a random curiosity: people were forced to find the answers to these natural disasters are threatening their lives. Therefore, fear, and for trying to escape the dangers that people aspire to indirectly know the truth about the Creator: and from here that science was born.

Religious life as they have the desire to avoid risk, and Science was born from the desire to know the truth about Creation.
History tells us that the first session of the inquiring computer science have appeared where the culture of Egypt and Mesopotamia, these guidelines are a monk. They are first interested to learn about nature and they take the time to find answers to these natural disasters are threatening humans.

However, similarities between the first session of Science and Religion is the starting point has divided Religion and Science. Reasons for this split are areas where the truth about nature.
Because of the danger, is threatening human life, related to life die, so should have the immediate answer. When an answer may appear acceptable, the consecutive days that the answer is written down and accepted as a law of Religion. The appropriate answer is given in many ways: the full mystery powwow, under our eyes is now what seems to be unreasonable, that oil, then it is a form easily acceptable added. To society, this method gradually formed the Religion was born.

There are currently, those who take the time to collect evidence, they separated and experiments. These people, through experiments and observations, they have the answers to the concept of Religion. This is called "Science," an understanding is formed through observation and experimentation.

This is no similarity between Science and Religion.

Answer as a panacea for the necessary time, to the east, and Princess heavy trust and loyalty, lack of impartial reviews. This is Religion. Therefore, heavy Religious beliefs.
While science-based inquiry, searching, and experimental observations. Science is not the answer to not experience; so, this is the environment only a few people, not for society. The experience and meticulous observation was continued and form what we today call the "Science."

At this point we understand the difference between Religion and Science: Religious for the winter, while science can only be suitable for a small number of people. To maintain the uniformity of international offerings, as well as teaching Catholics, Religion inclined to trust seriously. Rooted in religious faith, and based on trust to preserve the teachings. Religion is a belief system does not change with the teachers to be followed without questioning.
Science is for those who like to think, to learn. Nature of Science is inquiring the truth through experiments base. Science thus preserve and spread the truth through understanding how a computer failure and explain experience.

Religion is understood as the place there are answers to a single truth.

Actually, not Religion out the answer, but the answer given by the children who need it and from that Religion is formed.
Religions find answers to issues related to human life, from low to high, all levels. On the other hand, science observations from the truth expressed individual. Science stuff and salvaged the debris to assemble them together and hope to find appropriate answers. Although science should be the principle, but these principles also chemical conditions; so, the truth is found not necessarily completely. We can say Religion answer fully, still only a part of Science.
Because of Religion and Science are limited, so be a third appears, want to learn about life and the universe. This group is not satisfied with the answer because Religion is not in the scope of reasoning. Contrast, science has answers based on reason and argument but not the absolute answer.

This third party does not want to wait for science to answer, so they find the answer obtained by theory and separation without verifying. This method has been formed for a science is called as philosophy.
We can use a metric to compare the three subjects from the questions about nature, as follows:
1. Science - as is also verified in the past and observations should not have been appropriate answer.
2. Philosophy - try to find answers through the separation and arguments, that has not been verified.
3. Religion - the complete answer without verifying.
Science and philosophy have appeared in the Religion, and both try to find the answer clear, transparent. But both fail when they are not to be answered fully and adaptation in daily life. Conversely, Religion persists because the meeting was the question of human despite the belief that out.
Because Religion meet the immediate facts, answers to the east, but are not covered by the five senses receive, all you need is based on trust. And because the answer can not be verified they were always changing.
Sometimes an answer is given: people do not know right or wrong because where there verified. If they believe they accept instant. Then if there is another answer, as they do not know what is the true, because where there is verifiable. Therefore, those who are older like the answer is a new answer. So based on religious beliefs should also be changed according to different size ink of trust. So we can see that how much is Religion. Because the answer includes the absolute truth has not been proven, just based on faith. Thus, when the answer appears, then who believe, who do not.
Contrast, science answered slowly, order, verify each point one. Scientific problem with rationalism. By the new sentence: "There are many Religions but only one science only." But the look is history as science has no insight to look for the truth should have a lot of science. The reasoning about objects and space change constantly. So currently there are many subjects of Science are current. Science has the country to verify these theories had before, they do not agree with the theoretical tangle old and so we heard the "new physics" and "new science."
Science confrontation with outdoor scenes, based on the size of the ink on the senses. Religion is also targeted to outdoor scenes and people in context. Scientific observation only targeted foreign matter; Religion is targeting people with the ability of the senses for outdoor scenes.
Religion target because the level of spiritual development of each individual, so this is quite complex point where Religion.
Despite the circumstances, Religion is only referred to people when they have problems, and this issue should be resolved.

When you find the cause of a problem then look at the outdoor scenes Religion around, no other information is Science. Religion outdoor scenes look at to find the cause of the problem, or of suffering.
Religions seek to solve real problems of man, while the science to find the truth only to satisfy curious minds.
Religion has the answers because I want to speed level for a number of issues were forced to explain that the cause is due to forces beyond the human, the power of god, holy spirit, evil, and so on. .
About natural phenomena such as thunder, earthquake, etc. .. the international prayer or ceremony is set out. About sickness, fear or mental illness, then the "co-reinforced, crisp" as the mysterious ceremony specific to treat. Meanwhile science because motivated to answer for speed so they search and retrieve cause consider slowly.
Concerning Religion, Buddhism targeting of human life, but provided no fault of the issues where only outdoor scenes. Buddhists look at the causes of the problem where "Human and fruit" Human and fruit where people have ideas as unhealthy or bad actions, as well as the outside inside, even with the Minister or the Minister.
As usual, the teaching of Religious faithful by law, to strengthen the morality or human dignity. But usually is due obedience, or fear of punishment or for the benefit of the people that follow this law, rather than for understanding the harms and benefits of it by the laws of nature .

Religious orientation in the different aspirations of how each class human so over time, Religion and more sectarian because the level of knowledge of man is not the same.
In the past, the truth is verified by science five senses; over time, we have new tools at the telescope lens, a microscope, to enhance the ability of the senses. But this is the tool has reached the absolute top of them, and now we need these machines more sophisticated, more wonderful tricks.
Current language mathematics and computer are the latest tool used to verify.
The development of science with increasing test our new equipment, has become a specialized field that few have the comprehension, because a popular means where there are new machines up to help them verified on the inventions of science.

Contrast, for the winter Religion. So a person can still be popular or to acquire or remove without verifying.
Although there are some Religion, like science, for the "truth" for a few selected, the priest, priests, when they have given priority to the advancement on the spiritual , and this is the result of operating a personal computer rather than the true nature of Religion.
Buddhism is no discrimination because the true nature of nature is Buddha identity. How can we Buddha unique identity? Each individual has the right to understand and practice to awaken the truth, according to intelligence and understanding of each individual.

Remember that there are two types of inability to verify the truth. The first category because no tools needed to verify, because the type of Monday truth can not be verified by instruments.
Current Science are troubled about the two issues mentioned above, is trying to define the supreme truth, or inquiring authors answer in the world of spirit.

If the perspective of science is not expanded, then surely science will go into dead-end alley. Science has been inspired to find out the answer to the universe, but it seems we never get answers appropriately. As well as in the inquiring scientific research seems almost to find the truth, but truth is still out in the arms of Sciences.
Add Science "new" and Science "old" or physical "old" physical "new", we still have a second Scientific for the professional and other things for a popular . How much is the concept that science can not be a popular imagination that is. Not only his inability to understand, also said the self-verified information. This is not just happening to average people: a concept of science is not difficult to understand and imagine for a National Science ... So can people believe in the verbal go ahead.
Take an example. According to Science, the light is a wave and a molecule.
The National Science to find the definition for the nature of light "is a molecule, right?"
A group replied, "Yes. This is a molecule, an energy flow of electricity (photons).
But other groups said, "No, light is a wave."
Finally the light has a molecular medium and a wave. But it is something wrong? This should be proven by mathematics, and this step is actually beyond the understanding of ordinary people.
Let's look at some other examples: the astronomer tells us is the black hole (black hole) in the universe. They are honored with the attraction for crystals are strong enough that light is a molecule does not escape, and was attracted to it. Now for a normal person, they must understand why here? Something that light does not escape?
Next they said the hole that matter and energy were links into the dense mass that nothing on earth can compare it. To illustrate, they say, if space, a large building like the Empire State Building, (one hundred and two retail floors), is removed and the weight of this single space as the size of a needle ! The National Science explained the definition of what a black hole. One must understand why this popular?
In fact, how can understand the size of the needle that weight is a 102-storey tower. Impossible to understand so we just have to believe they are. We believe in science in a long time, despite the question. But actually in our hearts everybody is wondering, "UA, so what period? How are kìa? "
Science is trying to prove material contribution to their pick. These documents also not explain the questions about nature, the universe, as well as the existence of a molecule.
Science has gone so far verified by the senses. The hypothesis is proved by mathematics, and then be interpreted by the physicist. The truth is collapse of the algebra problem, but mathematics algebra is not the truth, so how can explain the truth to be a drain carrots. British scientists, Sir Arthur Eddington was finding the way to prove Einstein's theory of physics, said the following:
"Science is not able to lead people to truth. Science can only lead people to the shadow of the sign."
Both these observations to verify the method of Science is not really sure hundred percent, as limited by the tools or formulas.
Old days we absolutely believe in the attraction of Newton's law, until Einstein proved that this is not entirely correct. The lower aspects of atomic (subatomic), the law does not apply to the attraction is. In the Newton, where there are tools to lower the observed atoms. We must wait until the 20th century with the presence of Einstein, and use mathematical reasoning to determine the truth. So we must be careful. Certainly can not believe in anything, whether it can be verified by an experiment.
I remember the conversation Forum chickens and farm Dan Brown. Forum chickens every morning in agricultural food to bring Dan Brown. Day that Mr Brown will lead the chicken to eat. To the formula: "Chicken in Brown = been feeding him.
A morning, but Mr Brown to hand him a knife ... Formula: Ga = Mr Brown was seen feeding, were transformed into Brown = Chicken cut in his neck. "So was verified by observing continuous unsteady, so do not be a conclusion can be predetermined.
Considerable scientific management knowledge to help people, but through modern technology today, people know only enjoyment, only foster more participation, airports, si. Television was invented, rather than see to learn, to grow the knowledge and intelligence, but most people only see the TV as a hobby to kill time, and therefore they become too easily long and apathy. We have the media up new, instead of using them to expand knowledge and understanding; this properly we use them to encourage the delusion.
Science is not responsible for the abuse of this technique. Instead of using new techniques to help at birth, we use them to enrich themselves. Therefore, science for the East title in Religion. Blame anyone here? When a man asked: "Why Religion makes people believe too easy? but also the opposite question, "Why Science Now people neglect to Religion?"
There are very few people have a deep understanding of science. Majority, they only believe in what they heard or they learned. Science today so slowly as to become almost Religion, not only information or information only.
When science can answer these questions eventually drain of human science is at it will be perfect. Religion has to be excreted. Conversely, Religion which leads to truth, will stand in the position consistent with science. Meanwhile, Science and Religion will reach a common point, the last point where Religion becomes Science and Religion Science becomes, splitting the pair will be permanently lost.
Us to the earth in just one term. Circumstances are threats around us are not delayed. Problems in life need to be answered or need for speed is a medicine, now, now living present.
No matter how science can solve some problems our science also obstacles as "too little, too late." When you say "too little", I want to say to the understanding of science issues in basic human life. Science can not make people better, not make people happy, not only for people how to change bad habits, not worth the pain, sadness, anger more disappointing, etc. .. Science can not solve these social problems.
In terms of medical science has invented a drug useful for some patients with insomnia, or mental illness ... Some mental illnesses are less severe disease. Science and believe in the future they can invent the pill makes people happy. When you are sad, take the tablet dry immediately disappear ... But at this instant is more medicine, but that turned into home pleasure. Science has proven that the human mind, when happy or sad is that the more chemicals, if science can manufacture the substances, when sad or frustrated just taking the tablet will love life now . Pills "happiness" will be sold as food, then no one will be sad or disappointed suffering, only love and happy life only.
Religion is to bring people to place free. People can happiness without conditions from the outside to come. But the drug will be happy for people facing bankruptcy based on external conditions to be happy, making people lost their ability to self-reliance.
Science is not different from the ancient Religion of how, when people started based on the inventions of science to the pursuit of happiness. Also the old days, for fear of holy spirit, god punished, children who beg, van lay, sacrifice and put their lives into the hands of Christ divine. In either case, happiness and suffering of people in the hands of God or the sacred from outside conditions; and so Science and Religion has ruined ancient independence of man.
Science itself is not able to solve the problems of man. According to the terms of Buddhism, science and technology does not encourage people there are of good character (sila), does not encourage people purification of thought (Samadhi). Search materials developed scientific documents, but not only for us how to live a happy (Panna).
The latter is "too late." The truth of the science incomplete, so we can not provide appropriate answers, and also no signs that the science can answer these questions.
Understanding of science is ever changing. At the time like this is like another. If we have to wait for science appropriate answer probably die before we will know how to live life worthy of you.
Always find a scientific principle, but they found only a small part of the guidelines, such as find the debris of a large image. In the meantime science explain the fact, we use the technical facilities have to improve our lives and to follow the subject's own desire.
So, in fact not science, but technology has given us the specific results. To answer to the truth (truth or not) of the natural world, people must be based on Religion. Using Science to address the physical facilities. This is the case today.
Religion still existed on earth for people still waiting for an answer fully and completely; answer to the case and may be associated practice. Because the answer is not verified, and because science can not prove, so most people find themselves taking their faith.
Rapid scientific progress, but only on the technical aspects of material, also on the needs of people learn the truth about the natural science can not progress at encouraging.
The application of science and technology, mistakes are still common. The mistake occurred because of knowledge, due to lack of control or lack of caution that out.
Such drugs "chloramphenicol". Have a look this drug is widespread. This drug is known fuselage, of three patients. When you sick, just buy and drink a few members "chloramphenicol" sold everywhere. As long as about ten years later, discovered that the drug substance is accumulated in the body and bone marrow stops making blood cells develop in the blood, and many died of diphtheria (leukemia). Next is the drug DDT. Have a look we think the drug issues detailed DDT, worms, mosquitoes will no longer .... People think they can get more original than kill insects with DDT. Several years later, discovered that DDT is carcinogenic properties, can be deadly. In addition, while people with high disease medicines flooding the insects are immune (immune), and drugs are not effective unless again. Some countries banned the use of DDT, but the Thai DDT is still used today.
And this is the case of medicine "thalidomide". Thalidomide is a sedative so popular in medicine. Drugs known as standard for experienced many trials. The drug is used and promoted information that is the safest drug. The drug is praised so the rich and civilized usually very careful about medicines and medicine, allowed the drug sold by prescription. Drugs sold about five years, until 196l, discovered that this drug taking by women who are pregnant, the fetus will be deformed. Too late because the drugs were reversionary market place, it had approximately 8000 children born deformed. Another example, the case CFC "s (chlorofluorocarbons). Chemical group is used for information refrigerators, air conditioners, sprays and bottles. But then, the science of the environment and the world have voiced that these substances do lose some screen flexible gas (ozone layer) required for our earth. And so what we think is good, there are benefits to become harmful.